fbpx

Robo Advisors vs DIY Bogleheads 3-Fund Portfolio – Which should we choose?

Reading Time: 14 minutes

You can’t read investment news these days without stumbling upon the subject of Robo Advisory. It seems that one is launching every month or hearing that one Robo Advisor just closed a new round of funding. It’s becoming a huge industry here in Singapore.

 As of the middle of 2019, there’s already at least 11 Robo Advisors that are in operation and ready to take our money. However, should we use Robo Advisors?

What are their benefits? Given that we all know that there’s a perfectly good alternative – the Bogleheads 3-Fund Portfolio (“DIY Bogleheads Portfolio”) – why should we choose Robo Advisors over doing it ourselves and who is it suitable for?

In this post I’ll try to break the topic down and compare Robo Advisors to the DIY 3-Fund Portfolio so you can make a more informed choice! Here’s how I’m going to break it down, feel free to jump to the section that is most interesting for you!

So let’s get right into it!

Setup & Complexity

How much effort does it take to get started with a Robo Advisor? Usually there’s a 2 step process:

  1. Investor Risk Assessment
  2. Portfolio Aggressiveness Selection

During investor risk assessment, the Robo Advisor will assess our investment experience and our risk appetite in order to be able to provide us with a recommended portfolio allocation. This is to ensure that the investor is providing explicit consent to the investment strategy and fully understands the potential loss/gains they will make.

Then the Robo Advisors, as they each have their own investment algorithms tailored to each risk profile, will ask us to select the level of aggressiveness and level of loss we are willing to accept.

Once those 2 steps are complete, we simply have to fund the account and the Robo Advisor will begin investing our money.

In the case of the DIY Bogleheads Portfolio, we must also fill out the investor risk questionnaire in order to start trading with our brokerage of choice. Then we must determine our own portfolio allocation that matches our risk profile and start purchasing the components of our portfolio.

Robo Advisors tend to provide a bit more hand-holding for new investors here compared to the  DIY Bogleheads Portfolio.

Robo AdvisorsDIY Bogleheads Portfolio
Risk assessment quiz & portfolio type selection.Determine target asset allocation based on risk tolerance and investment horizon.

Winner: Robo Advisors

Investor Involvement & Decision Making

Once we’re all set up, which of the options require more effort from the investors to continue management? Well in the case of the Robo Advisors, we simply have different choices:

  1. When to add more funds
  2. When to withdraw funds
  3. The risk profile of the funds

If we want to be hands off, the Robo Advisors provide the most simple and low-maintenance option – very similar to a Target Date Retirement Fund in terms of simplicity. As long as we have a constant transfer of funds into our Robo Advisor, we’re pretty much set, the Robo Advisory firm will perform all the rebalancing for us no matter the market conditions.

As for the DIY Bogleheads Portfolio, we’ll need to log in every once in a while, even if we have a permanent standing instruction to transfer funds into our brokerage account. We’ll need to make purchase decisions each time we would like to buy. Should we be buying International, Local or Bond funds this time?

However, if we have the allocations locked down, it won’t take more than 20 minutes each time to calculate the amount that needs to be invested into each fund and whether any rebalancing is required.

Despite that, I’d say that Robo Advisors are definitely simpler in this regard. If you’d like to be as hands off as possible, Robo Advisors are for you.

Robo AdvisorsDIY Bogleheads Portfolio
Once set up with regular standing instructions, no other management is required.Each purchase the investor will need to decide which of the portfolio ETF they will buy and how much.

Winner: Robo Advisors

Time Commitment

As for the amount of time it takes to manage the portfolio, Robo Advisors are pretty hands off. Aside from ensuring that funds are being added to your portfolio, the investor does not even need to log in to rebalance the portfolio. Again, a very good alternative to a Target Date Retirement Funds – except with higher fees – since we don’t have one of those in Singapore.

In the case of the DIY Bogleheads Portfolio, there’s rebalancing activities once a year and purchasing the correct allocation every few months.

Robo AdvisorsDIY Bogleheads Portfolio
After set up, almost none.20 minutes each purchase.20 minutes to rebalance once or twice a year.

Winner: Robo Advisors

Tax Obligations

Now we get into the more complex issue of tax obligations. It’s always important for investors to understand their tax residency and their tax obligations when investing. If not attention is paid, we could be losing a lot of potential gains or be in serious tax violations.

The majority of Robo Advisors in Singapore rely quite heavily – sometimes completely – on ETF and funds that are listed in the U.S. and this means that we will be subjected to the tax rules and laws of the U.S.

U.S. Citizens and Residents are subjected to U.S. State and Federal Taxes on all of their income (depending on whether the investments are in tax-deferred accounts or special retirement accounts.)

As non-U.S. Citizens or Residents, our tax situation will depend on how we choose to invest in the U.S. securities, however there are 2 major categories of taxes that we will need to pay attention to: Dividend Withholding Tax and Estate Tax.

Let’s take a look at each separately.

Dividend Withholding Tax

As a Singapore-based investor holding the U.S.-listed securities directly through the Robo Advisor, dividends are subjected to a 30% dividend withholding tax by the U.S. government. There are ways to lower this by claiming some of the tax back and although all Robo Advisors say that they will attempt to minimise this withholding tax as possible, it’s not clear how much they can reduce the tax.

However, as a DIY Bogleheads Portfolio investor, we can choose to purchase a comparable Irish-Domiciled ETF instead of a U.S.-Domiciled one. Through the tax relationship between the U.S. and Ireland, our dividend withholding tax obligations drops in half, to just 15%.

Given the significant impact of dividend reinvestment on the final portfolio value, this will mean that the DIY Bogleheads Portfolio has a leg up here.

Robo AdvisorsDIY Bogleheads Portfolio
30% Dividend withholding tax.15% Dividend withholding tax.

Winner: DIY Bogleheads Portfolio

Estate Tax

An estate tax or inheritance tax is paid when you pass on. This is paid by your estate or beneficiaries of your estate. Since both the Robo Advisor and DIY Bogleheads Portfolio involves holding U.S. securities in some form, we have to take a look at how U.S. Federal Estate Tax laws apply to us to make sure we’re not paying more tax than we need to.

As far as I can tell, the majority of the Robo Advisors in Singapore depends on Saxo Capital Markets Pte. Ltd. to be the custodian of the ETF purchased as part of the Robo Advisory services. This means that the U.S. securities purchased will be held by a Singapore-based company which, according to this article, is not exempted from the U.S. 40% Federal Estate Tax.

This means that when we pass away, if we have more than US$60,000 in our investment accounts – that’s not high at all for a retirement portfolio. Anything above that amount is subjected to a 40% tax. To be clear, that is massive. Before your family or dependents can access the funds after you passed away, Saxo and the Robo Advisor are legally obligated to withhold the estate tax to be paid to the U.S. government before paying out the funds to your estate.

In the case of the DIY Bogleheads Portfolio, as long as we are purchasing the Irish-Domiciled ETFs for our portfolio, we will not have this estate tax obligation through the tax treaties that Ireland has with the U.S.

Robo AdvisorsDIY Bogleheads Portfolio
40% estate tax obligation.No estate tax requirement if using Irish-Domiciled ETF.

Winner: DIY Bogleheads Portfolio

Investment Performance

Performance is going to be a tough one to judge quantitatively. Most of the Robo Advisors here all claim great performance. Each of them follow some form of private smart portfolio creation algorithm that back-tests very well according to each of the respective companies.  They’re all also way too young to get proper numbers and given that they were all setup during the longest bull market in recent times, all of them are reporting great returns since they have started.

Since we’re looking for something that will last us during our long FIRE retirement timeline, we’d need to also see how they will perform over 30 years or longer.

Most Robo Advisors claim to invest in broad-based, well-balanced and properly risk-managed portfolios. It seems that they usually follow a variant of the Modern Portfolio Theory with some sprinkle of proprietary algorithm, adjusted based on back-testing – which obviously doesn’t guarantee future returns.

In terms of returns, I have no reason to believe that they will perform horribly compared to the DIY option. The risk, of course, is that their investment models are too tightly fitted to the past performance and doesn’t do well in the future, but that’s speculation and there isn’t any evidence that it would be the case.

So I think for the purpose of this analysis, we will assume that the performance of Robo Advisors and DIY Bogleheads Portfolio are comparable once we’ve managed to set them both up to match our risk profile. That way we can do cost comparisons on equal terms.

Winner: Tie (Assumption)

Fees & Costs

Now we’ve come to one of the most important sections, costs.

If you are an avid follower of the FIRE community, you will know that one key indicator of investment returns is how low we can get our investment fees to be. It’s often one of the best predictors of a fund’s investment performance.

Robo Advisors are profit-seeking companies, and they will have to make their profits somehow. This is the reason that it should not come as a surprise that by going with Robo Advisors, we will be paying more in terms of fees. However, how much more is it compared to the DIY Bogleheads Portfolio and given all the convenience that comes with it, is it worth it?

Well that’s what we’re going to find out here and then I’ll let you decide whether it’s worth it for you.

Pros and Cons Robo Advisors

The key benefits on the Robo Advisors side when it comes to fees are:

  1. The amount needed to start an investment portfolio is very low so it’s very easy to get started.
  2. There’s usually no transaction fees involved when investing which benefits those who are not making high salaries. Perfect for fresh graduates and allows investors to put money into the market quickly and often. With the DIY Bogleheads Portfolio, investors might have to wait a few months to accumulate the funds to minimize the percentage of the investment that goes to brokerage fees.
  3. No account maintenance fees.
  4. Clear and simple fee structure. Often Robo Advisors simply charge a flat percentage of the asset under management and that’s it. Great for when the portfolio size is small, but not as good when portfolio size is large.

The cons:

  1. Once the portfolio value becomes large, the flat Robo Advisor fees quickly becomes very high in absolute dollar amounts that it may not be as worth it to keep the funds there.

Robo Advisors are very good for those starting out investing and they can get in quickly and cheaply, but gets expensive later on due to the management fee.

Pros and Cons of the DIY Bogleheads Portfolio

The benefits of the DIY portfolio is simple, once you get larger portfolio size, the fees become a much smaller portion of the portfolio that it becomes much cheaper than Robo Advisors.

Now the cons, with a DIY portfolio, many brokerages will charge a minimum transaction fee or a percentage per transaction, whichever is higher. Therefore with small amounts to save, the transaction fee ends up eating up a large chunk of the investment before it even gets to work for you.

If we have to wait for a few months before accumulating enough to invest, that could mean our money sits on the sideline for longer than we’d like and miss out on any market gains (which also means we miss out on any losses, we take the good with the bad.)

The Difference in Fee Structure

Let’s take a look at the different fees that Robo Advisors charge compared to the DIY Bogleheads Portfolio:

Cost ItemsRobo AdvisorsDIY Bogleheads Portfolio
Minimum BalanceS$0 – S$3,000
Minimum Transaction for Lowest FeeS$8,000
ETF Expense Ratios0.15% – 0.20% p.a. (We’ll use 0.15%)0.30% – 0.35% p.a. (We’ll use 0.35%)
Robo Management Fee0.50% – 0.80% p.a. charged monthly (We’ll use 0.50%)
Custody FeeS$2.14 per international ticker per month
Transaction Fee0.40% per transaction
Account FeeS$16.05 per quarter

The cost for the DIY Bogleheads Portfolio is based on the brokerage platform that I personally use currently, Phillip Capital’s POEMs. Yours may be different.

So as you can see, the DIY Bogleheads Portfolio has a more complex fee structure and higher transaction cost, but the Robo Advisors have higher management fee.

The Robo Advisors also use lower fee ETFs from the U.S. whereas the DIY Portfolio makes use of the relatively higher fee ETF that are domiciled in Ireland. However, the increase in cost is not by much and is still much lower than the 0.5% charged by the lowest of the Robo Advisors.

In both cases, the investor must pay the underlying fund’s expense ratio as well as all the other fees imposed by the Robo Advisor or the brokerage.

Logic would dictate that Robo Advisors will start out being much cheaper, but will eventually become more expensive than the DIY Bogleheads Portfolio. The question is when.

In order to do a proper comparison, we’d need to do this calculation over time and then comparing the total cost throughout the life-time of the portfolio. We’ll need to find the Total Life-Time Cost for both options:

Illustration of the fees involved in each option
Total Life-Time Cost Comparison

And we’re going to do just that in the sections below!

Preconditions & Assumptions for Investing

In order to calculate the Total Life-Time Costs of both options, let’s assume that we’re going to invest into both options with the setup below. We’ll do it such that the starting conditions for the hypothetical investor is the same for both cases:

Monthly Investable SavingS$2,000
Robo Advisor Investing FrequencyEvery Month (Since no transaction fee.)
DIY Portfolio Investing FrequencyEvery 4 Months (Accumulate S$8,000 per purchase to minimize brokerage fee.)
DIY Portfolio Ticker Count3 International (IWDA, EIMI, IUAG) and 1 Local (ES3)
Fund PerformanceAssumed same performance of 7% real return p.a. for both Robo and DIY.
Safe Withdrawal Rate4%

Using the above pre-conditions, we will simulate the investments using 2 investment scenarios:

  1. Scenario 1: Standard Retirement – The person works and invest for 40 years in order to retire at around 65 for a maximum of 30 years.
  2. Scenario 2: Early Retirement – The person works and invest for just 20 years and retire around 45 for a 50 year retirement period.

Both scenarios have the investor start working at 25 and live until the ripe old age of 95 years old.

We will withdraw funds from the portfolio at 4% per year during retirement to sustain our standard of living. Ready? Let’s take a look at the results!

Scenario 1: Standard Retirement – Work and invest for 40 years with 30 years of retirement

So after a total of 70 years of S$2,000 per month investment, here’s what the portfolio value looks like for this scenario:

Chart of the portfolio value of Robo Advisor vs DIY Bogleheads Portfolio
Portfolio value of Robo Advisor vs DIY Bogleheads Portfolio

Here’s the chart for the total fees paid:

Chart of the total fees paid for Robo Advisor vs DIY Bogleheads Portfolio
Total fees paid for Robo Advisor vs DIY Bogleheads Portfolio

Here’s the percentage of fee per month against the total portfolio value:

Chart of the percentage of the portfolio value that is paid as fee for Robo Advisor vs DIY Bogleheads Portfolio
Percentage of the portfolio value that is paid as fee for Robo Advisor vs DIY Bogleheads Portfolio

Here’s the summary table:

CaseRobo AdvisorsDIY Bogleheads Portfolio
Portfolio Value @ RetirementS$4,418,813.27S$4,721,499.73 (+6.85%)
Portfolio Value @ EndS$8,990,668.75S$10,489,577.02 (+16.6%)
Total Fees Paid @ EndS$1,591,287.31S$958,679.71 (-39.7%)
Average Fees Per MonthS$1,894.39S$1,140.40 (-39.8%)
Starting Monthly WithdrawalS$3,233.47S$3,299.05
Total WithdrawalS$7,742,571.26S$8,692,762.54 (+12.3%)
Months to cost more than DIY47

Let’s break it down:

  1. Robo Advisors are cheaper for the first 4 years of the investment.
  2. After 4 years the DIY portfolio becomes cheaper and remains cheaper for the life of the portfolio.
  3. The DIY Bogleheads Portfolio ends up paying 40% less in fees (S$632,607.60 less) for the life of the portfolio in total than the Robo Advisor.
  4. The DIY Portfolio value at the start of Retirement is 6.85% higher than the Robo Advisor.
  5. The DIY Portfolio value ends up with 16.6% higher at the end of life than the Robo Advisor.
  6. The DIY Portfolio also provided 12.3% more withdrawn funds based on a 4% withdrawal of the portfolio value each year.

Of course, this is an ideal scenario where the performance is a constant 7% return, we are not guaranteed a performance this consistent, not even close.

The actual results in the real world will never follow such a clean graph, but the key point will remain true: As our portfolio increases in value, the more costly the Robo Advisors become and the cheaper it is to manage it ourselves through the DIY Portfolio.

Scenario 2: Early Retirement – Work and invest for 20 years with 50 years of retirement

Now let’s take a look at the second scenario, the early retiree. This is the likely case for somebody like me who will work and invest for a shorter length of time but want to live on the investment for much longer.

Here’s the total portfolio value:

Chart of the portfolio value of Robo Advisor vs DIY Bogleheads Portfolio
Portfolio value of Robo Advisor vs DIY Bogleheads Portfolio

Total fees paid:

Chart of the total fees paid for Robo Advisor vs DIY Bogleheads Portfolio
Total fees paid for Robo Advisor vs DIY Bogleheads Portfolio

Then the fees per month:

Chart of the percentage of the portfolio value that is paid as fee for Robo Advisor vs DIY Bogleheads Portfolio
Percentage of the portfolio value that is paid as fee for Robo Advisor vs DIY Bogleheads Portfolio

Here’s the summary table:

CaseRobo AdvisorsDIY Bogleheads Portfolio
Portfolio Value @ RetirementS$970,041.08S$989,715.68 (+2.03%)
Portfolio Value @ EndS$3,162,076.94S$3,724,494.50 (+17.79%)
Total Fees Paid @ EndS$645,601.42S$395,417.49 (-38.94%)
Average Fees Per MonthS$768.57S$469.29 (-38.94%)
Starting Monthly WithdrawalS$14,729.38S$15,738.33
Total WithdrawalS$3,718,769.18S$4,135,376.84 (+11.20%)
Months to cost more than DIY47

Again, we see a very familiar result. Given the shorter investment timespan we see only a 2% higher balance in the DIY portfolio compared to the Robo Advisor over the 20 year investment.

However, at the end of the investor’s life, that difference has compounded to a 17.8% difference in the DIY portfolio’s favor. The total fees paid in total is also 39% less.

Again, the total withdrawal in the DIY portfolio is higher as the portfolio balance is higher on the DIY side.

The number of months where the Robo Advisor has lower absolute fees remained the same at 47 months or about 4 years.

So on the fee side, the DIY portfolio is a better choice for such a long time horizon and portfolio balance.

Important: I’d have to repeat that this result is also due to the regular returns of our simulation. If the Robo Advisor’s investment approach handles the rebalancing and market cycles better than the DIY portfolio, then the results could turn out very different. However, there’s no way to tell one way or the other that the Robo Advisors will outperform in the long term compared to the DIY portfolio, so it’s up to you to decide if you think that this is important enough to affect your decision.

Winner: DIY Bogleheads Portfolio

Putting it all together

Phew! That’s all the analysis we’re doing today to compare the Robo Advisors to the DIY Bogleheads Portfolio! I hope that it was informative and insightful for you.

Let’s bring it all together and see why an investor should choose Robo Advisor vs why they should select to DIY and hopefully you’ll be able to make a decision on which one you will go with.

Choose Robo Advisor if you:Choose DIY Bogleheads Portfolio if you:
Don’t mind the higher fee.Want to maximise returns by minimising fees and dividend withholding tax.
Do not have large amounts to save each month.Want to avoid having to deal with U.S. Estate Tax when you pass away.
Prefer the most simple to set up and most simple to manage solution – a set-it-and-forget-it option.Don’t mind spending 20 minutes every month to manage and rebalance your portfolio.
Don’t want to risk having your emotions to get in the way and ruining your investment.Have no problems sticking to your investment plan & portfolio allocation.

At the end of the day, I think picking either one and sticking with it is not a horrible option. It’s certainly much better than not starting investment at all.

So if investing is something you’d rather not think about and spend time on at all, then a Robo Advisor would be a good choice.

However, if you prefer to minimise costs, maximise returns, don’t mind doing some research and don’t mind spending a few minutes each month – an hour or so each year – adjusting your investments then DIY is the way to go.

Aaaaaaaand that’s it! Simple!

I hope that makes sense and I’d love to hear which option sounds like the one for you!

Let me know what you think in the comments below or just tweet at me @firepathlion.

Until next time!

FPL

24 thoughts on “Robo Advisors vs DIY Bogleheads 3-Fund Portfolio – Which should we choose?”

  1. Just curious what’s your recommendation of how to allocate the $8000.00 per quarter.

    Since to get the lowest fee possible we should invest $8000.00 and above to enjoy the Low percentage charges.

    • Hey Xavier! Thanks for asking, the way I would recommend you allocate the S$8,000 is to look at your current portfolio allocation to see if any of the assets are sitting below your ideal allocation and put all of the funds into that asset class.

      Say if your ideal allocation is 10% local fund, 80% international, and 10% bond, but are actually sitting at 15% local, 75% international and 10% bond, then the easiest would be to put all of $8,000 into the international fund to try to bump it up to 80%.

      If everything is already equal then you can pick one that you think is currently undervalued (which will increase its percentage) and then the next month, rotate to the next fund.

      This way you are optimally making the purchase to reduce the fee and at the same time will automatically be “rebalancing” throughout the year by adding money to the fund that is cheap or underperforming. This also reduce the need for you to rebalance all at once at the end of the year.

      I hope that explanation is clear, let me know if you would like more elaboration!

  2. Hey FPL! Thanks for the insight and your recommendation!

    Definitely makes more sense to save costs while consider it as a form of rebalancing.

  3. Hi FIRE-Path Lion,

    You might want to consider switching to Standard Chartered to save on the Account Maintenance Fee, Foreign Shares Custody Charges and Cash Dividend Handling Fees(levied on your local stock market and bond fund). SCB has none of these and it only costs US 10 /trade vs GBP 20 for POEMS.

    Further more if your total holdings with the bank exceeds $200k, you’ll qualify for priority banking that offers a low 0.2% commission per trade, no minimums. Not too difficult to accumulate $200k if you store all of your 3-Fund portfolio at the bank.

    • Hmmmm I have heard that SCB is cheaper, however I’ve also heard that their foreign exchange spreads are quite high (1%-2%?) If the exchange spread is as high as 2% then it negates all the other positives since that really eats into the amount used to purchase securities no matter how large your trade is. Do you happen to know what the actual exchange rate spread is for SCB?

      I’m actually considering Saxo as an alternative if we look at just the fees alone, their minimum fees are even lower than SCB.

      • Hi, I read complains about poor FX rates on SCB being equal to 1%. Then my question is why no one is going to use some middle man solution? For example, open SC trading account in USD or EUR (this are 2 currencies in which most Irish-domiciled ETFs are available) and then find online FX company where you can send SGD and convert it to USD/EUR via wire back? It should be the most effective way.

        • Hey Seb! That’s often going to be more expensive because (depending on the bank and the 3rd party FX company) they charge several fees that make that solution not worth it:
          1. Transfer Fee. Usually when you transfer funds in non-local currency, the transfer provider will charge a transfer fee. If you use a U.S. bank or provider that perform USD transfer for free, you will need to pay for a Telegraphic Transfer to send the money overseas.
          2. Foreign Currency Deposit / Receiving Fee. Now I’m not sure if SCB charges when you transfer funds into a Singapore account in USD. Usually banks will charge you when you want to deposit funds in cash in foreign currencies. They may also charge you when you Transfer foreign currencies in.

          This is to close the loophole that you have mentioned. Either way, there’s fee involved. You’ll have to calculate which option is cheaper. Often it may not be worth the trouble.

          In this case, I haven’t looked into the details but I suspect that trying to do the above will end up being more expensive than just letting SCB convert the currency in the first place.

          • Hi, I don’t live in Singapore anymore and SGD was never my main earning currency, so I did not explore the available options. But I am sure they do exist and you may be wrong in the way you think they work. So online FX changer (focused on SG market) should have SGD bank account in Singapore for free and FAST SGD transfers. In my experience with various banks in the world and different online money changers is that they usually send bank transfers as OUR (sender cover all fees), meaning that you are neither going to be hit with intermediary bank fees, nor the incoming TT transfer fee usually charged by SG banks (S$10). Please have a look at this post: https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/121414629-post8.html . I am sure there are more options to the one shown in this thread, it’s just a matter of doing some research.

          • You are right here. I’ll have to look into this more. It certainly sound like something that could be done to save on the exchange cost and still take advantage of SCB’s low fee structure.

      • It’s usually no higher than 1%, I’m seeing 0.88% now at 11PM SGT. Not sure how some people are reporting 2%, maybe that’s when both US and SG markets are closed/outside of working hours? What sort of rates do you get with POEMS?

        SAXO levies a 0.12% Custody fees for foreign stocks and a charges a Currency conversion fee of 0.5 %. It does still seem cheaper than POEMS though.

        • Hey Mark! POEMs charges a low flat custody fee per ticker so I think it’s better than a percentage one once the portfolio size becomes larger! So seems like on that front, might be better to keep POEMs for me
          🤔

          • Hmm but I think we’re talking about the cost of currency conversion from SGD to USD here. What’s POEMS’ foreign exchange spread like?

            Also, it actually gets worse as your portfolio size gets bigger because POEMS charges the custody fee on your entire USD portfolio, every year. 😅 The SCB 1% foreign exchange spread charges applies only once, that is at the point when you convert over to USD.

          • Hey Mark! Based on my previous trades, the difference between the rate that is charged by POEMs and the rate I see on Google or XE.com is about 0.28%. If we take Google and XE rates as the middle between the bid and ask spreads, it’s likely that the bid-ask spread for POEMs is 0.56% which isn’t too bad.

            For custody fee, I am currently using the Prepaid account, which according to this info sheet on Philip Capital website:
            https://www.poems.com.sg/FinancialServices/CC_INFOSHEET.pdf The custody fee is a flat dollar amount ($2.14) per ticker per month, not based on percentage of the holding. So as the portfolio size gets larger, the custody fee is a really small percentage of the portfolio value to maintain the account.

  4. Thank you for the detailed and informative write up! I love the way you break down ideas and present it in digestible pieces. FYI there’s a typo in the 5th last paragraph
    “However, if you prefer to minimise your returns,” should this be maximise?

    • Hey Jocelyn! Thank you for reading and I’m glad you enjoyed the post! Also yes! You caught my typo. It’s supposed to be minimize cost and maximize return! I’ll get that fixed 🤦🏻‍♂️

  5. Hi, love your write-ups, there’s so much work put into them. But, just wondering what brokerage you’re currently using? And if you’ve done any analysis on the different between them?

    • Hey Skylar! Thanks for reading and for your kind words! Unfortunately I have not done any comparisons between brokerages yet but I’ve been getting similar requests for it so I might do one soon! Is there any brokerage that you are looking at so I will make sure to include it when I do a comparison.

  6. Hi there! Love your write ups. Recently trying to go into FI planning as well.

    Have a quick question. What do you think about using robo Advisors for overseas portfolio and at the same time invest another sum into sti etf? Do you think it’s feasible at all?

    Thanks!

      • Mainly for the ease of roboadvisors! Just putting a sum to auto transfer every month for roboadvisors and also at the same time for dbs savings plan into sti etf.

        Of course I think it would definitely be better to invest it on my own but I’m still starting out so there’s a lot I’m not sure of yet and to read up but I do want to take advantage of the funds I have now currently and not wait around a few months haha. Do you think that’s a wise choice?

        Thanks for the reply btw!

        • I certainly don’t think it’s a bad choice! Robo Advisors are extremely easy and has low management overhead. If you want to take some time to learn how to do it yourself, you can do a lot worse than by investing through Robo advisors until you’re more knowledgeable.

          The management fees are relatively low and the portfolio used is diversified. Do make sure that you choose one that invests in broad based passive funds though.

  7. Hey! What do you think of the new SPDR MSCI World ETF that was recently opened and is basically the same as Ishares one, except it has 0.12 TER compared to 0.20.
    Would it be better to invest into this fund from now on?
    Thank you and love your blog ;3

    • Hey Lumi! Yes I’ve heard of the SPDR MSCI World ETF. I would say it’s a great option for when you are adding to your portfolio instead of IWDA as the components are essentially the same but with a lower expense ratio. However, since the difference in expense ratio is only 0.08% (which is only $8 per year for every $10,000) I would say it’s not worth it to sell all your IWDA holding to buy this one if you have already purchased IWDA (since brokerage fees are usually around 0.4% which is 5x more than the annual saving), just buy this one when you are adding to your portfolio. Although, depending on your brokerage, they may charge custody fee per each ticker, so adding a new ticker will mean you may have to pay more in custody fee on a quarterly basis for an additional ticker. So you’ll have to work out how much that is and whether the 0.08% saving will be worth it.

      The only issue I can find with this new ETF would be daily volume and NAV. Since it’s relatively new, the NAV will be low which means the fund isn’t large. This also means that there are less people trading this ticker and thus if you need to sell it, you might have a harder time finding a buyer. If you’re just buying it over time and will be unlikely to need to sell a large amount of your holdings urgently, then this shouldn’t matter much. However, it does also mean that during crashes and downturns, it might be hard to get out of your position. For long-term buy-and-hold investors like us, it should not matter though. Hope that helps!

      • On thinking about this longer, the 0.08% saving is a 40% saving over then 0.20% TER which is quite significant.

        Although the brokerage fee is 0.4% in my case, if I sell all of my IWDA holding and then buy this immediately, the savings in TER will cancel out the cost of the brokerage fee within 5 years. As long-term investors that’s nothing, so it could also be worth it to sell all my IWDA to buy this to save on the TER.

        The only remaining concern would be the size of the fund and the daily volume as I mentioned. IWDA last trading volume is about ~55,000 but SWRD is in the ~200 so that difference is quite large still. The NAV for IWDA is $20 billion where SWRD, being new, is just $325 million so quite a sizable difference.

        I’m cautious, so I’ll wait and see for now to see if the volume and NAV increases before shifting over. It’s also entirely possible that the TER for IWDA will be reduced in response to the launch of SWRD.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.